Hello All I've tested Auto Gordian Knot (AGK) and Clone DVD Mobile on the same 1:41 minute file. AGK takes 5 hours 24 minutes CloneDVD Mobile takes 1 hour 54 minutes I cannot see a difference between the quality of the two avi files. Are there any settings I can make to get AGK closer to the CloneDVD Mobile processing time? Any ideas on this would be appreciated. Here are some specs and settings: PC Specs OS: Windows XP Home, Service Pack 3 Direct X: 9.0c Processor: Pentium 4, 2400 MHz Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-8SQ800 Motherboard Chipset: SiS 655 RAM: 1GB Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 6200 (512 MB) 3D Accelerator: nVIDIA GeForce 6200 AGP Audio Adapter: Realtek ALC650 @ SiS 7012 Audio Device AGK Settings and Resulting AVI No subtitles Quality setting 75 Output Resolution: Autowidth Output Audio Type: VBR MP3 144kbps Codec XVID (XVID on my PC is Xvid-1.2.1-04122008 _Final Release_) Resulting AVI after 5:24 processing 720 x 544 133 kbps 1.77 gb CloneDVD Mobile Settings and Resulting AVI Resolution: 720 x 540 Video Quality: 23 1 pass encoding Resulting AVI after 1:54 minutes processing 720 x 540 128 kbps 1.57 gb
See if changing the AGK Quality setting to match CloneDVD makes a difference - I haven't used CloneDVD.
AGK quality setting range is 10 to 100 CloneDVD Mobile quality setting range is 10 to 166 - so a setting in one does not necessarily match the other. I set the quality settings of the two programs so that each would produce an avi of approximately the same size (that's why the two quality setting numbers do not match. Is it incorrect to assume similar size avi's have the same amount of compression? That's why I assume the quality appears to me similar between the two files. So if the original files start out the same, and are compressed to approximately the same degree by both programs, is there a reason why one program takes so much longer to do the compression than the other. If I am making incorrect assumptions here re: the compression of the files, please set me straight.
AGK, if you set the output size, it does two passes to ensure the target is reached. If you set 'Target Quality' it does one pass - and is certainly faster. But as to comparing the two programs - I have nothing to offer.