DVDshrink - Smooth vs. Sharp

Discussion in 'DVDR' started by carino, Oct 11, 2006.

  1. carino

    carino Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    When I'm compressing a movie down, is it generally better to use smooth or sharpen? Does it depend on the movie? I'm guessing that it's better to use sharpen if you plan to watch on a regular TV and smooth if you plan to watch on an HDTV/monitor?

    What do most people use?
     
  2. bjhgames

    bjhgames Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I don't use either. To me both make movies hard to watch. I suggest you run the deep analysis but don't use the adaptive error compensation. But maybe I just had bad luck.
    Personally, if the compression setting (quality) is less than 80% I would not compress. I would use a program like DVDFabDecrypter and split to two disks. But I have seen a couple movies with half decent quality from from much lower compression settings.
    Good luck!
     
  3. alkohol

    alkohol Regular member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    If you're the few that owned any 45" or higher (50 - 55) HDTV, then it's wise to use "Deep Analysis + AEC + Max Smoothness" especially if you value the quality of your backups. However, the choice is yours.

    Anything under 85% - 60% on DVD Shrink's quality (meaning there are 15% - 40% of compressions needed), I'll use "DA + AEC + Max Smooth". But afterall, I would rather use Nero Recode instead (from the same author who originally created DVD Shrink), it's much faster than DVD Shrink.

    Anything under 60% on DVD Shrink's quality (meaning there are 40% or more compressions needed), then I'll simply use DVD-RB Pro + CCE SP 2.70 to encode.
     
  4. carino

    carino Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Interesting.

    This CCE 2.70... that's quite expensive. is it worth $2000?
     
  5. movies27

    movies27 Regular member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    When i used to use shrink i always used max sharpness for a sharp crystal clear movie.
     
  6. Norm9

    Norm9 Guest

    @alkohol:

    I never realised that about Nero Recode
    Something to think about!
     
  7. MysticE

    MysticE Active member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    >>>> This CCE 2.70... that's quite expensive. is it worth $2000?

    Most frontends that use CCE use the $58 version.

    http://www.cinemacraft.com/eng/basic.html

    As was stated if you are into copying the whole disc (lots of compression) it's the way to go. For me as a 'movie only' type I've found Shrink's transcoder produces better (cleaner, sharper) results if only light compression, 90+%, is needed. This was not the case before the AEC tweaks were implemented.
     
  8. Norm9

    Norm9 Guest

    Yeah if the film is worth it i'll use the compression as its usually the time spent compressing V the main movie
    As i had to back-up The Weatherman for someone recently as i found out it took over 5hrs! (its a good thing i dont do many back-ups)

    As with a prev. post i tried to backup just the 'main movie' but couldnt find a file size that big in Reauthor mode - Donno why!
    What was it like before the 'tweaks'
     

Share This Page