I have a SLI mobo with SATA RAID controllers on it. I want to get dual raptor 80GB drives to boot with. So my question is can I buy two raptor 80gb hard drives and raid them with RAID 0 and boot from those drives with the SATA RAID 0 setup? Is that possible. I read some other threads saying they couldnt boot with a SATA drive and they had to boot from a IDE drive and jus tuse the SATA RAID as backups because their PC wouldnt recognize the SATA drives to boot from?
i think we have members using sata as boot drives & threads too. when loading xp for 1st time it asks you if wanting to load 3rd party drivers which if right you have to if using sata drives.
It works just do as ddp said and install the drivers when you first load windows. I run sata and sata 2 works great.
can someone explain to me what this "sata" is, im confused lol, sorry for the stupid question i know, but hey we all started from scratch at some point or another
Serial ATA (also S-ATA or SATA) is a computer bus primarily designed for transfer of data between a computer processor and hard disk. It has evolved from the legacy Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA a.k.a. IDE) standard. It has at least three main advantages over its predecessor, namely speed, cable management and hot-swappability. It is probable that normal ATA will be renamed by back formation to parallel ATA (P-ATA) so the two are not confused. Initially Serial ATA was released at 150 megabytes per second but it is designed to scale up quite substantially from there. Serial ATA II will double throughput to 300 MB/s and then 600 MB/s is planned for around 2007. However at 150 MB/s it is still only 17 MB/s faster than the current (2003) fastest parallel ATA interface ATA/133. Parallel buses have difficulty in reaching ever higher speeds due to problems keeping all the data lines in sync. Serial ATA uses the newer LVDS for the signalling. Still, the need for such a high speed interface could be debated as hard disks are almost always a bandwidth bottleneck being mechanical devices. Physically, the cables used are the largest change. The data is carried by a light flexible seven conductor wire with 8 mm wide wafer connectors on each end. It can be anywhere up to one meter long. Compared to the short (18 inch, 45cm) ungainly 40 or 80 conductor ribbon cables of parallel ATA this will come as much relief to system builders. In addition, airflow and therefore cooling in equipment will be improved. The concept of a master/slave relationship between devices has been dropped. Serial ATA has only one device per cable. The connectors are keyed -- it should no longer be possible to install cable connectors upside down. Native Serial ATA hard disks also require a different power connector as part of the standard. It is wafer based but wider than the data cable so it should not be possible to confuse the two. Fifteen pins are used to supply three different voltages if necessary -- 3.3 V, 5 V and 12 V. The same physical connections are used on 3.5 inch and 2.5 inch (notebook) hard disks. In the transitional period between parallel and serial ATA various adapters are planned to convert one to the other. To perform the serial to parallel translation or vice versa a bridge is used. There is a noticeable performance penalty for such an arrangement however and tests conducted in early 2003 show throughput reduced around 30-50 percent. This restriction will only completely disappear when controllers and hard disks support Serial ATA natively. A similar standard is planned for SCSI with Serial Attached SCSI which is expected to be ratified in late 2003. It has a level of compatibility with Serial ATA.
so by that ddp that text is mainly saying that its a much easier and faster way on transfering data between teh cpu and the hard drive.
@CKY_2084 as ddp said during the first install of xp you will need to hit f6 and load the raid driver . also in the bios tell it to boot off the sata raid . what stripe size do you plan to use ?
